WCC vs. WMS
WCC (WESCO International, Inc.) and WMS (Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — WCC in Industrial Distribution, WMS in Building Products & Equipment. Over the past 10 years, WCC returned 20.57%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for WMS. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WCC vs. WMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCC achieves a 40.88% return, which is significantly higher than WMS's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WCC has outperformed WMS with an annualized return of 20.57%, while WMS has yielded a comparatively lower 19.30% annualized return.
WCC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 19.08%
- YTD
- 40.88%
- 1Y
- 70.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 27.20%
- 10Y*
- 20.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.14%
WMS
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -8.69%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 19.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $255.89M | $266.79M | $225.20M | |
| $81.32M | $85.77M | $122.07M |
WCC vs. WMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCC WESCO International, Inc. | 40.88% | 36.43% | 5.09% | 40.19% | -4.86% | 67.63% | 32.18% | 23.73% | -29.57% | 2.40% |
WMS Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | -4.15% | 25.97% | -17.48% | 72.44% | -39.53% | 63.46% | 116.70% | 67.74% | 2.78% | 17.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCC and WMS is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014 | 0.50 |
The correlation between WCC and WMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
WCC:
$16.73B
WMS:
$10.61B
WCC:
$14.35
WMS:
$5.44
WCC:
23.93
WMS:
25.45
WCC:
1.22
WMS:
1.26
WCC:
0.68
WMS:
3.40
WCC:
$25.01B
WMS:
$3.19B
WCC:
$2.48B
WMS:
$1.27B
WCC:
$1.57B
WMS:
$586.61M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCC vs. WMS — Risk / Return Rank
WCC
WMS
WCC vs. WMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCC | WMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.13 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 0.82 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 1.72 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCC vs. WMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCC drawdown since its inception was -86.28%, which is greater than WMS's maximum drawdown of -53.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCC and WMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCC | WMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.28% | -53.58% | -32.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.54% | -25.98% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.37% | -45.75% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.37% | -50.12% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.82% | -53.58% | -25.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.15% | -21.88% | +13.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -17.90% | -16.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 12.42% | -5.03% |
Volatility
WCC vs. WMS - Volatility Comparison
WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) has a higher volatility of 16.33% compared to Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) at 9.14%. This indicates that WCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCC | WMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.33% | 9.14% | +7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.07% | 29.14% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.60% | 40.96% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.10% | 42.37% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 41.74% | +3.51% |
Dividends
WCC vs. WMS - Dividend Comparison
WCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than WMS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCC WESCO International, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMS Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | 0.53% | 0.48% | 0.54% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 3.48% | 1.28% | 1.13% | 1.12% | 0.79% |
Financials
WCC vs. WMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WESCO International, Inc. and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WCC vs. WMS - Profitability Comparison
WCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.24B and revenue of 6.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -18.6%.
WMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 354.44M and revenue of 816.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.
WCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported an operating income of 382.20M and revenue of 6.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.
WMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 53.25M and revenue of 816.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.
WCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported a net income of 209.00M and revenue of 6.67B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
WMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 32.90M and revenue of 816.10M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCC and WMS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCC has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to WMS (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCC dropped -86.28% vs WMS's -53.58%.
WCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCC and WMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer