GTX vs. STN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Stantec Inc (STN).

Performance

GTX vs. STN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Stantec Inc (STN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GTX vs. STN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	4.66%	97.23%	-6.62%	26.90%	-5.11%	81.26%	-55.66%	-19.04%	-35.66%
STN Stantec Inc	-8.25%	21.08%	-1.44%	68.90%	-13.76%	75.67%	16.56%	31.83%	-12.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GTX : $3.59B STN : $9.86B
EPS GTX : $1.54 STN : $3.89
PE Ratio GTX : 11.82 STN : 22.23
PEG Ratio GTX : 0.09 STN : 0.92
PS Ratio GTX : 1.02 STN : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) GTX : $3.58B STN : $7.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) GTX : $850.00M STN : $3.14B
EBITDA (TTM) GTX : $429.00M STN : $1.01B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTX achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly higher than STN's -8.25% return.

GTX

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.40%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 34.58%
• 1Y: 121.27%
• 3Y*: 34.50%
• 5Y*: 28.69%
• 10Y*: —

STN

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: -8.25%
• 6M: -19.55%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 15.87%
• 10Y*: 14.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GTX vs. STN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

STN

STN Risk / Return Rank: 46
STN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
STN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
STN Omega Ratio Rank: 41
STN Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
STN Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTX vs. STN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Stantec Inc (STN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTX	STN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	0.19	+2.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	0.43	+3.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.06	+0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.36	0.24	+6.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.23	0.57	+16.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTX vs. STN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the STN Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTX and STN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTX	STN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	0.19	+2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.65	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.44	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between GTX and STN is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GTX vs. STN - Dividend Comparison

GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than STN's 0.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	1.54%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STN Stantec Inc	0.77%	0.69%	0.78%	0.79%	1.14%	1.17%	1.42%	1.55%	1.91%	1.79%	1.78%	1.69%

Drawdowns

GTX vs. STN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTX drawdown since its inception was -93.08%, which is greater than STN's maximum drawdown of -67.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTX and STN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTX	STN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.08%	-67.42%	-25.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.87%	-25.41%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.76%	-27.94%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.16%	-23.72%	+9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.11%	-17.03%	-35.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.34%	10.67%	-3.33%

Volatility

GTX vs. STN - Volatility Comparison

Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Stantec Inc (STN) at 7.23%. This indicates that GTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTX	STN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.54%	7.23%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.84%	21.42%	+10.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.95%	27.03%	+18.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.79%	24.56%	+16.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.75%	25.39%	+38.36%

Financials

GTX vs. STN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Garrett Motion Inc. and Stantec Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 185.00M and revenue of 891.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

STN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 788.76M and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.

GTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -405.00M and revenue of 891.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -45.5%.

STN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 184.05M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

GTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 84.00M and revenue of 891.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

STN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 93.82M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.