WCAP vs. MTUM
WCAP (WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCAP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by WarCap, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. WCAP is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCAP charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
WCAP vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCAP achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 28.58% return.
WCAP
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- -5.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 27.05%
- YTD
- 28.58%
- 1Y
- 35.98%
- 3Y*
- 32.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- 16.57%
WCAP vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WCAP WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF | -5.71% | -2.03% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 28.58% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCAP and MTUM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCAP vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
WCAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MTUM
WCAP vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF (WCAP) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCAP | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCAP vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCAP drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCAP and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCAP | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -34.08% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -6.96% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -6.19% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
WCAP vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCAP | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 23.66% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 21.53% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 21.50% | -5.34% |
WCAP vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCAP has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCAP vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
WCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than MTUM's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.58% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
WCAP WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCAP and MTUM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WCAP.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.04% for WCAP.
WCAP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: WarCap and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for WCAP and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for WCAP and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer