WCAP vs. BDGS
WCAP (WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WCAP charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
WCAP vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCAP achieves a -10.09% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 1.44% return.
WCAP
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -10.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.57K | $241.96K | $186.72K | |
| $192.07K | $142.51K | $80.15K |
WCAP vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WCAP WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF | -10.09% | -2.03% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.44% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCAP and BDGS is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCAP vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
WCAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDGS
WCAP vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF (WCAP) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCAP | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCAP vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCAP drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCAP and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCAP | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -9.12% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.15% | -4.76% | -8.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -0.69% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility
WCAP vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCAP | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 6.66% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 8.21% | +7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 8.21% | +7.79% |
WCAP vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCAP has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCAP vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
WCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BDGS's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.54% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
WCAP WarCap Unconstrained Equity ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCAP and BDGS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WCAP.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.04% for WCAP.
They also come from different issuers: WarCap and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for WCAP and 0.87% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for WCAP and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer