WBIY vs. TMVE
WBIY (WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - WBIY tracks the Solactive Power Factor High Dividend Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIY charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
WBIY vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIY achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 14.73% return.
WBIY
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 26.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- —
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIY vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WBIY WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF | 10.00% | 5.74% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 14.73% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIY and TMVE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBIY vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
WBIY
TMVE
WBIY vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIY | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIY | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 3.18 | -2.81 |
Drawdowns
WBIY vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIY drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIY and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIY | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -8.21% | -40.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.23% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -1.54% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | — | — |
Volatility
WBIY vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBIY | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 13.94% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 13.94% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 13.94% | +8.71% |
WBIY vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIY has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBIY vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
WBIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIY WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF | 4.41% | 4.73% | 4.57% | 4.87% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 5.10% | 4.54% | 3.25% | 5.84% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBIY and TMVE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for WBIY.
WBIY has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
WBIY tracks Solactive Power Factor High Dividend Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: WBI and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for WBIY and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for WBIY and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer