WBIL vs. PID
Compare and contrast key facts about WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID).
WBIL and PID are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WBIL is an actively managed fund by WBI. It was launched on Sep 3, 2014. PID is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
WBIL vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WBIL vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | -3.45% | -0.47% | 13.29% | 11.79% | -9.60% | 18.67% | -2.19% | 11.65% | -9.67% | 19.31% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 2.04% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -11.46% | 19.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly lower than PID's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIL has underperformed PID with an annualized return of 5.13%, while PID has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.
WBIL
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.13%
PID
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WBIL vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WBIL vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
WBIL
PID
WBIL vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.64 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 2.39 | -1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 2.36 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 10.33 | -8.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.64 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.69 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.50 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIL and PID is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WBIL vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than PID's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.29% | 1.03% | 2.02% | 0.19% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.58% | 0.20% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.38% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Drawdowns
WBIL vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and PID.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -66.34% | +41.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -8.83% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | -22.97% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.30% | -46.07% | +20.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.18% | -5.36% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -13.12% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 2.02% | +1.47% |
Volatility
WBIL vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 3.80%. This indicates that WBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WBIL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.80% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 7.11% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 12.81% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 13.96% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 17.99% | -5.52% |