WBIL vs. BDVL
WBIL (WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WBIL is actively managed, while BDVL is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIL charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
WBIL vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a 12.59% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.74% return.
WBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 12.59%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
BDVL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIL vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 12.59% | 2.96% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.74% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIL and BDVL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.71 |
WBIL vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WBIL
BDVL
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
WBIL
BDVL
Industrials
WBIL
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
WBIL
BDVL
Financial Services
WBIL
BDVL
Communication Services
WBIL
BDVL
Healthcare
WBIL
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
WBIL
BDVL
Real Estate
WBIL
BDVL
Basic Materials
WBIL
BDVL
Energy
WBIL
BDVL
Utilities
WBIL
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBIL vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank
WBIL
BDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WBIL vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBIL | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBIL vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIL | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -7.71% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -1.40% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -1.18% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility
WBIL vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBIL | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 9.67% | +5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 9.67% | +4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 9.67% | +3.11% |
WBIL vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBIL vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BDVL's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.55% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.29% | 1.03% | 2.02% | 0.19% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.58% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBIL and BDVL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for WBIL.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.04% for WBIL.
They also come from different issuers: WBI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for WBIL and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for WBIL and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer