PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBGSX vs. WBIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than WBIIX's 14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, WBGSX has outperformed WBIIX with an annualized return of 15.17%, while WBIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.


WBGSX

1D
1.37%
1M
9.28%
YTD
10.75%
6M
9.39%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
15.17%

WBIIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
5.97%
YTD
14.90%
6M
17.75%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
10.75%10.69%21.86%37.75%-29.75%21.71%36.12%32.11%4.88%24.19%
WBIIX
William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund
14.90%18.16%2.40%15.23%-28.39%9.30%32.69%30.75%-17.49%29.51%

Correlation

The correlation between WBGSX and WBIIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2002

0.68

The correlation between WBGSX and WBIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBGSX vs. WBIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBGSX
WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

WBIIX
WBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WBGSXWBIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

1.59

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

2.23

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.78

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.11

6.73

-2.62

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the WBIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBGSX and WBIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WBGSXWBIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.59

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.18

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.50

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, smaller than the maximum WBIIX drawdown of -65.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and WBIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBGSXWBIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-65.13%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

-13.17%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-17.06%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.90%

-40.91%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

-40.91%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-14.80%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

3.48%

+3.39%

Volatility

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) is 4.48%, while William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that WBGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WBIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBGSXWBIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

5.45%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

12.69%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

15.00%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

16.66%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

17.18%

+3.36%

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WBIIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBGSX vs. WBIIX - Dividend Comparison

WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.70%, more than WBIIX's 10.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
39.70%43.96%34.53%12.73%4.59%14.82%15.07%10.27%38.86%38.00%8.81%13.92%
WBIIX
William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund
10.90%12.53%7.49%2.51%6.57%16.58%12.61%0.95%11.74%4.16%1.15%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBGSX and WBIIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBIIX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to WBGSX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs WBIIX's -65.13%.

WBGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBGSX and WBIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer