PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBGSX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBGSX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBGSX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WBGSX having a 14.02% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 14.63%.


WBGSX

1D
2.82%
1M
-1.84%
6M
4.85%
YTD
3.28%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
14.02%
ALL TIME*
9.56%

VTI

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.63%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.06B$1.16B$1.24B
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WBGSX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
3.28%10.69%21.86%37.75%-29.75%21.71%36.12%32.11%4.88%24.19%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.49%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WBGSX and VTI is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.93

The correlation between WBGSX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBGSX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WBGSX
WBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WBGSX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBGSXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.23

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

9.62

-8.67

WBGSX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBGSX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBGSX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBGSX drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBGSX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBGSXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-55.45%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

-8.92%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-19.30%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.90%

-25.36%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

-35.00%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.74%

-1.36%

-5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-7.99%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

2.07%

+5.10%

Volatility

WBGSX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that WBGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBGSXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

3.46%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

10.24%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

13.10%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.80%

17.51%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

18.30%

+2.35%

WBGSX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBGSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBGSX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

WBGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.57%, more than VTI's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
WBGSX
William Blair Growth Fund
42.57%43.96%34.53%12.73%4.59%14.82%15.07%10.27%38.86%38.00%8.81%13.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, WBGSX and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WBGSX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBGSX dropped -53.05% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBGSX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer