WBELX vs. LZEMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WBELX (William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund) and LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, WBELX returned 8.20%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for LZEMX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WBELX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LZEMX.

Performance

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBELX achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 25.59% return. Over the past 10 years, WBELX has underperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.

WBELX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 6.71%
• YTD: 17.95%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 38.22%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 8.20%

LZEMX

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 25.59%
• 6M: 27.25%
• 1Y: 54.81%
• 3Y*: 28.77%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WBELX William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund	17.95%	26.44%	5.86%	6.14%	-25.85%	-7.51%	27.53%	28.37%	-17.41%	41.89%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	25.59%	41.35%	7.60%	22.44%	-14.86%	5.37%	-0.07%	18.06%	-18.11%	28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between WBELX and LZEMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008	0.85

The correlation between WBELX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WBELX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBELX

WBELX Risk / Return Rank: 52
WBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
WBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
WBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
WBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WBELX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	4.17	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	5.34	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.78	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	5.37	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	19.75	-9.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBELX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WBELX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	4.17	-1.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.91	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.67	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.41	-0.22

Drawdowns

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBELX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than LZEMX's maximum drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBELX and LZEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBELX	LZEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.98%	-60.08%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.72%	-10.42%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.98%	-14.27%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.63%	-30.55%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.26%	-44.08%	-1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-1.08%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.78%	-16.63%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	2.83%	+1.18%

Volatility

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 5.40%. This indicates that WBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WBELX	LZEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	5.40%	+1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.89%	11.02%	+3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.15%	13.43%	+4.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	14.33%	+2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	16.39%	+1.14%

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBELX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBELX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

WBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than LZEMX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.63%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%
WBELX William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund	0.75%	0.88%	0.25%	0.78%	0.99%	8.25%	1.00%	0.88%	10.92%	0.67%	0.13%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBELX and LZEMX in my portfolio?

WBELX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WBELX or LZEMX?

WBELX has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to LZEMX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBELX dropped -64.98% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.