PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBELX vs. EFEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBELX achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than EFEIX's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WBELX has outperformed EFEIX with an annualized return of 8.40%, while EFEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.


WBELX

1D
2.88%
1M
6.42%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.15%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
8.40%

EFEIX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.08%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.69%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBELX
William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund
20.10%26.44%5.86%6.14%-25.85%-7.51%27.53%28.37%-17.41%41.89%
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
4.99%20.69%24.12%10.60%-15.91%24.18%-4.12%14.07%-18.04%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between WBELX and EFEIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013

0.51

The correlation between WBELX and EFEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBELX vs. EFEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBELX
WBELX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EFEIX
EFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBELXEFEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.74

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

5.04

+4.80

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the EFEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBELX and EFEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBELX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than EFEIX's maximum drawdown of -40.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBELX and EFEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBELXEFEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.98%

-40.50%

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

-11.62%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.98%

-11.62%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.63%

-20.83%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.26%

-40.50%

-4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.52%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-12.25%

-6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

4.02%

+0.11%

Volatility

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) at 3.93%. This indicates that WBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBELXEFEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

3.93%

+6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

10.54%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

12.26%

+7.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

10.07%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

11.07%

+6.66%

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBELX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EFEIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBELX vs. EFEIX - Dividend Comparison

WBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than EFEIX's 10.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
10.45%11.69%2.15%2.26%0.17%1.61%0.96%1.63%1.44%0.88%0.38%0.00%
WBELX
William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund
0.73%0.88%0.25%0.78%0.99%8.25%1.00%0.88%10.92%0.67%0.13%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBELX and EFEIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBELX has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to EFEIX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBELX dropped -64.98% vs EFEIX's -40.50%.

WBELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBELX and EFEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer