WBELX vs. EFEIX
WBELX (William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund) and EFEIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, WBELX returned 8.40%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for EFEIX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBELX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for EFEIX.
Performance
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBELX achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than EFEIX's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WBELX has outperformed EFEIX with an annualized return of 8.40%, while EFEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.
WBELX
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 20.10%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 40.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
EFEIX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBELX William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund | 20.10% | 26.44% | 5.86% | 6.14% | -25.85% | -7.51% | 27.53% | 28.37% | -17.41% | 41.89% |
EFEIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund | 4.99% | 20.69% | 24.12% | 10.60% | -15.91% | 24.18% | -4.12% | 14.07% | -18.04% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBELX and EFEIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between WBELX and EFEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBELX vs. EFEIX — Risk / Return Rank
WBELX
EFEIX
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBELX | EFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.74 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 5.04 | +4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBELX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than EFEIX's maximum drawdown of -40.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBELX and EFEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBELX | EFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.98% | -40.50% | -24.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -11.62% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.98% | -11.62% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.63% | -20.83% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.26% | -40.50% | -4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.52% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -12.25% | -6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 4.02% | +0.11% |
Volatility
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) at 3.93%. This indicates that WBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBELX | EFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | 3.93% | +6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.42% | 10.54% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 12.26% | +7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 10.07% | +7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 11.07% | +6.66% |
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBELX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EFEIX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBELX vs. EFEIX - Dividend Comparison
WBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than EFEIX's 10.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund | 10.45% | 11.69% | 2.15% | 2.26% | 0.17% | 1.61% | 0.96% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 0.88% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
WBELX William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund | 0.73% | 0.88% | 0.25% | 0.78% | 0.99% | 8.25% | 1.00% | 0.88% | 10.92% | 0.67% | 0.13% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBELX and EFEIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WBELX has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to EFEIX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBELX dropped -64.98% vs EFEIX's -40.50%.
WBELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBELX and EFEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer