WATT vs. SMFG
WATT (Energous Corporation) and SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. WATT operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while SMFG operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WATT returned -43.03%/yr vs 19.63%/yr for SMFG. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WATT vs. SMFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WATT achieves a 501.25% return, which is significantly higher than SMFG's 22.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WATT has underperformed SMFG with an annualized return of -43.03%, while SMFG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.63% annualized return.
WATT
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -14.99%
- YTD
- 501.25%
- 6M
- 499.75%
- 1Y
- 185.70%
- 3Y*
- -47.41%
- 5Y*
- -57.34%
- 10Y*
- -43.03%
SMFG
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 22.61%
- 6M
- 20.30%
- 1Y
- 61.84%
- 3Y*
- 46.37%
- 5Y*
- 30.86%
- 10Y*
- 19.63%
WATT vs. SMFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WATT Energous Corporation | 501.25% | -86.83% | -44.81% | -89.06% | -33.12% | -30.56% | 1.69% | -69.43% | -70.23% | 15.43% |
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 22.61% | 38.01% | 54.90% | 25.63% | 21.70% | 10.05% | -11.00% | 19.47% | -22.21% | 17.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between WATT and SMFG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
WATT:
$93.14M
SMFG:
$149.38B
WATT:
-$3.86
SMFG:
¥563.43
WATT:
5.85
SMFG:
1.11
WATT:
2.18
SMFG:
1.52
WATT:
$8.37M
SMFG:
¥15.42T
WATT:
$3.00M
SMFG:
¥8.35T
WATT:
-$8.08M
SMFG:
¥3.54T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WATT vs. SMFG — Risk / Return Rank
WATT
SMFG
WATT vs. SMFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energous Corporation (WATT) and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WATT | SMFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.09 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 8.75 | -4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WATT vs. SMFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WATT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than SMFG's maximum drawdown of -77.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATT and SMFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WATT | SMFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -77.26% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.01% | -20.12% | -56.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.67% | -25.67% | -72.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.79% | -27.88% | -71.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -47.66% | -52.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.87% | -6.06% | -93.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.11% | -47.96% | -25.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.95% | 7.09% | +36.86% |
Volatility
WATT vs. SMFG - Volatility Comparison
Energous Corporation (WATT) has a higher volatility of 27.10% compared to Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) at 9.05%. This indicates that WATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WATT | SMFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.10% | 9.05% | +18.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.22% | 21.84% | +65.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 125.33% | 28.69% | +96.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 266.72% | 28.87% | +237.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.91% | 26.85% | +187.06% |
Dividends
WATT vs. SMFG - Dividend Comparison
WATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 1.27% | 2.84% | 2.82% | 3.67% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 5.97% | 4.61% | 4.80% | 3.17% | 3.63% | 3.32% |
WATT Energous Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WATT vs. SMFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energous Corporation and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WATT vs. SMFG - Profitability Comparison
WATT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energous Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.10M and revenue of 3.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
SMFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37T and revenue of 2.51T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.
WATT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energous Corporation reported an operating income of -1.85M and revenue of 3.08M, resulting in an operating margin of -59.9%.
SMFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 364.07B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.
WATT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energous Corporation reported a net income of -1.66M and revenue of 3.08M, resulting in a net margin of -53.7%.
SMFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.66B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WATT and SMFG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WATT has higher volatility (27.10%) compared to SMFG (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WATT dropped -99.98% vs SMFG's -77.26%.
SMFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WATT and SMFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer