WATT vs. SLVP
WATT (Energous Corporation) is a stock, while SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, WATT returned -42.73%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WATT vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WATT achieves a 546.37% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WATT has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of -42.73%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.
WATT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- YTD
- 546.37%
- 6M
- 503.98%
- 1Y
- 241.14%
- 3Y*
- -45.58%
- 5Y*
- -57.11%
- 10Y*
- -42.73%
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 6M
- -7.77%
- 1Y
- 89.99%
- 3Y*
- 53.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
WATT vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WATT Energous Corporation | 546.37% | -86.83% | -44.81% | -89.06% | -33.12% | -30.56% | 1.69% | -69.43% | -70.23% | 15.43% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -4.09% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between WATT and SLVP is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between WATT and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WATT vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
WATT
SLVP
WATT vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energous Corporation (WATT) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WATT | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.38 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 6.08 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WATT vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WATT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATT and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WATT | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -80.47% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.01% | -38.06% | -38.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.72% | -38.06% | -59.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.79% | -48.41% | -51.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -62.03% | -37.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -30.82% | -69.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.08% | -46.75% | -26.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.81% | 14.84% | +28.97% |
Volatility
WATT vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Energous Corporation (WATT) has a higher volatility of 29.35% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 18.72%. This indicates that WATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WATT | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.35% | 18.72% | +10.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.23% | 45.60% | +41.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 125.44% | 55.19% | +70.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 266.71% | 43.23% | +223.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.98% | 42.52% | +171.46% |
Dividends
WATT vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
WATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
WATT Energous Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WATT and SLVP have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WATT has higher volatility (29.35%) compared to SLVP (18.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WATT dropped -99.98% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
WATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WATT and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer