SMFG vs. TXT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Textron Inc. (TXT).

Performance

SMFG vs. TXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Textron Inc. (TXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMFG vs. TXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.	2.17%	38.01%	54.90%	25.63%	21.70%	10.05%	-11.00%	19.47%	-22.21%	17.95%
TXT Textron Inc.	0.47%	14.08%	-4.80%	13.71%	-7.87%	59.93%	8.60%	-2.86%	-18.62%	16.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SMFG : $75.99B TXT : $15.51B
EPS SMFG : $613.97 TXT : $4.49
PE Ratio SMFG : 0.03 TXT : 19.50
PEG Ratio SMFG : 0.00 TXT : 0.40
PS Ratio SMFG : 0.01 TXT : 1.17
PB Ratio SMFG : 0.00 TXT : 1.97
Total Revenue (TTM) SMFG : $15.21T TXT : $13.88B
Gross Profit (TTM) SMFG : $8.04T TXT : $2.66B
EBITDA (TTM) SMFG : $3.26T TXT : $1.48B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than TXT's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SMFG has outperformed TXT with an annualized return of 16.92%, while TXT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.

SMFG

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: -11.99%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 6M: 17.98%
• 1Y: 30.07%
• 3Y*: 39.10%
• 5Y*: 25.79%
• 10Y*: 16.92%

TXT

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -11.22%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 3.68%
• 1Y: 21.31%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SMFG vs. TXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMFG

SMFG Risk / Return Rank: 70
SMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

TXT

TXT Risk / Return Rank: 66
TXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TXT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TXT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMFG vs. TXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Textron Inc. (TXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMFG	TXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.74	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	1.12	+0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.17	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.24	+0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.14	3.24	+0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMFG vs. TXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the TXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMFG and TXT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMFG	TXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.74	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.34	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.28	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.24	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SMFG and TXT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SMFG vs. TXT - Dividend Comparison

SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than TXT's 0.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.	1.52%	2.84%	2.82%	3.67%	2.12%	0.00%	5.97%	4.61%	4.80%	3.17%	3.63%	3.32%
TXT Textron Inc.	0.09%	0.09%	0.10%	0.10%	0.47%	0.10%	0.17%	0.18%	0.17%	0.14%	0.16%	0.19%

Drawdowns

SMFG vs. TXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, smaller than the maximum TXT drawdown of -94.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and TXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMFG	TXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.26%	-94.72%	+17.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.12%	-16.23%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.88%	-37.33%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.66%	-69.96%	+22.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.05%	-13.09%	-3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.43%	-27.04%	-21.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.18%	6.18%	+1.00%

Volatility

SMFG vs. TXT - Volatility Comparison

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Textron Inc. (TXT) at 6.46%. This indicates that SMFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMFG	TXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.71%	6.46%	+4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.93%	18.06%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.76%	28.87%	+3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.41%	27.29%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.09%	32.85%	-5.76%

Financials

SMFG vs. TXT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Textron Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SMFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.33T and revenue of 7.93T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

TXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Textron Inc. reported a gross profit of 901.00M and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.

SMFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.90T and revenue of 7.93T, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

TXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Textron Inc. reported an operating income of 145.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

SMFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.39T and revenue of 7.93T, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.

TXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Textron Inc. reported a net income of 141.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.