PortfoliosLab logo
SMFG vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMFG and XLF is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SMFG vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SMFG:

0.56

XLF:

1.21

Sortino Ratio

SMFG:

1.08

XLF:

1.86

Omega Ratio

SMFG:

1.16

XLF:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

SMFG:

0.92

XLF:

1.73

Martin Ratio

SMFG:

2.62

XLF:

6.70

Ulcer Index

SMFG:

9.45%

XLF:

4.01%

Daily Std Dev

SMFG:

36.75%

XLF:

20.32%

Max Drawdown

SMFG:

-75.59%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

SMFG:

-7.54%

XLF:

-1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SMFG has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 9.86%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.


SMFG

YTD

6.69%

1M

11.46%

6M

1.24%

1Y

20.30%

3Y*

41.62%

5Y*

25.70%

10Y*

9.86%

XLF

YTD

5.87%

1M

2.45%

6M

1.09%

1Y

24.34%

3Y*

15.59%

5Y*

17.72%

10Y*

14.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMFG vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMFG is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMFG is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMFG is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMFG is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMFG is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMFG is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SMFG vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMFG and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SMFG vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than XLF's 1.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.56%2.82%3.67%2.12%5.24%5.97%4.61%4.80%3.17%3.63%3.32%3.13%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.40%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

SMFG vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and XLF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SMFG vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 4.42%. This indicates that SMFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...