PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAT vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAT vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waters Corporation (WAT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAT achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, WAT has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 10.62%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.


WAT

1D
2.11%
1M
25.80%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-4.49%
1Y
8.70%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
10.62%

VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAT vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAT
Waters Corporation
-0.02%2.39%12.68%-3.90%-8.06%50.59%5.89%23.85%-2.35%43.75%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WAT and VHT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.62

The correlation between WAT and VHT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAT vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAT
WAT Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
WAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
WAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAT vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waters Corporation (WAT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WATVHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

1.38

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

3.47

-2.91

WAT vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAT and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WATVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.00

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.30

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.55

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.56

-0.12

Drawdowns

WAT vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAT drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAT and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WATVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.12%

-39.12%

-41.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.32%

-10.40%

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.45%

-16.91%

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.27%

-17.71%

-26.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.27%

-28.85%

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.58%

-7.05%

-3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-5.99%

-17.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.61%

4.14%

+11.47%

Volatility

WAT vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

Waters Corporation (WAT) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.08%. This indicates that WAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WATVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.54%

4.08%

+12.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.58%

10.08%

+19.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.81%

14.34%

+24.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.54%

14.96%

+18.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.78%

16.94%

+13.84%

Dividends

WAT vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAT and VHT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAT has higher volatility (16.54%) compared to VHT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAT dropped -80.12% vs VHT's -39.12%.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAT and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer