PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WAT vs. VZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


WATVZ
YTD Return14.42%15.63%
1Y Return41.13%21.09%
3Y Return (Ann)2.92%-1.98%
5Y Return (Ann)11.66%-1.99%
10Y Return (Ann)12.88%2.78%
Sharpe Ratio1.331.03
Sortino Ratio2.301.51
Omega Ratio1.281.21
Calmar Ratio1.180.69
Martin Ratio4.965.15
Ulcer Index9.20%4.17%
Daily Std Dev34.36%20.82%
Max Drawdown-80.12%-50.61%
Current Drawdown-11.30%-16.44%

Fundamentals


WATVZ
Market Cap$22.91B$170.07B
EPS$10.47$2.31
PE Ratio36.8517.49
PEG Ratio3.581.08
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.91B$134.24B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.72B$80.47B
EBITDA (TTM)$786.64M$44.83B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between WAT and VZ is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

WAT vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WAT achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 15.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WAT has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 12.88%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.50%
4.81%
WAT
VZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WAT vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waters Corporation (WAT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WAT, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WAT, currently valued at 4.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.96
VZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VZ, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VZ, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VZ, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VZ, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VZ, currently valued at 5.15, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.15

WAT vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAT and VZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.33
1.03
WAT
VZ

Dividends

WAT vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
6.54%6.96%6.53%4.86%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%4.57%4.22%

Drawdowns

WAT vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAT drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAT and VZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.30%
-16.44%
WAT
VZ

Volatility

WAT vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

Waters Corporation (WAT) has a higher volatility of 19.19% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 7.75%. This indicates that WAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.19%
7.75%
WAT
VZ

Financials

WAT vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waters Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items