PortfoliosLab logo
WAT vs. VZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WAT and VZ is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

WAT vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waters Corporation (WAT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
427.44%
214.99%
WAT
VZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WAT:

0.21

VZ:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

WAT:

0.64

VZ:

0.87

Omega Ratio

WAT:

1.08

VZ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

WAT:

0.23

VZ:

0.55

Martin Ratio

WAT:

0.74

VZ:

2.34

Ulcer Index

WAT:

10.60%

VZ:

5.44%

Daily Std Dev

WAT:

37.52%

VZ:

22.23%

Max Drawdown

WAT:

-80.12%

VZ:

-50.61%

Current Drawdown

WAT:

-20.44%

VZ:

-11.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WAT:

$20.10B

VZ:

$180.49B

EPS

WAT:

$10.70

VZ:

$4.20

PE Ratio

WAT:

31.58

VZ:

10.19

PEG Ratio

WAT:

2.25

VZ:

2.12

PS Ratio

WAT:

6.80

VZ:

1.33

PB Ratio

WAT:

11.09

VZ:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

WAT:

$2.32B

VZ:

$101.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WAT:

$1.36B

VZ:

$60.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

WAT:

$843.51M

VZ:

$35.37B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAT achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, WAT has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 10.43%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 3.32% annualized return.


WAT

YTD

-8.92%

1M

-8.13%

6M

4.11%

1Y

9.58%

5Y*

12.08%

10Y*

10.43%

VZ

YTD

8.43%

1M

-3.62%

6M

4.78%

1Y

14.12%

5Y*

-0.70%

10Y*

3.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WAT vs. VZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAT is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAT is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAT is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAT is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAT is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAT is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VZ is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VZ is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VZ is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VZ is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VZ is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VZ is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WAT vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waters Corporation (WAT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for WAT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
WAT: 0.21
VZ: 0.57
The chart of Sortino ratio for WAT, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
WAT: 0.64
VZ: 0.87
The chart of Omega ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
WAT: 1.08
VZ: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for WAT, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
WAT: 0.23
VZ: 0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for WAT, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
WAT: 0.74
VZ: 2.34

The current WAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAT and VZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.21
0.57
WAT
VZ

Dividends

WAT vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
6.44%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.86%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%4.57%

Drawdowns

WAT vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAT drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAT and VZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-20.44%
-11.35%
WAT
VZ

Volatility

WAT vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

Waters Corporation (WAT) has a higher volatility of 17.61% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 8.81%. This indicates that WAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.61%
8.81%
WAT
VZ

Financials

WAT vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waters Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items