WAT vs. VZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Waters Corporation (WAT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WAT or VZ.
Correlation
The correlation between WAT and VZ is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WAT vs. VZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WAT:
0.40
VZ:
0.67
WAT:
0.93
VZ:
1.04
WAT:
1.11
VZ:
1.14
WAT:
0.42
VZ:
0.50
WAT:
1.49
VZ:
3.17
WAT:
9.32%
VZ:
4.48%
WAT:
34.43%
VZ:
21.18%
WAT:
-80.12%
VZ:
-50.66%
WAT:
-13.31%
VZ:
-18.36%
Fundamentals
WAT:
$22.19B
VZ:
$171.67B
WAT:
$10.47
VZ:
$2.31
WAT:
35.69
VZ:
17.65
WAT:
3.51
VZ:
1.08
WAT:
$2.91B
VZ:
$134.24B
WAT:
$1.69B
VZ:
$80.47B
WAT:
$1.04B
VZ:
$38.87B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAT achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 12.97% return. Over the past 10 years, WAT has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 12.42%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 3.32% annualized return.
WAT
11.82%
-0.09%
26.83%
11.65%
9.61%
12.42%
VZ
12.97%
-6.05%
2.43%
13.60%
-3.05%
3.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WAT vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waters Corporation (WAT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WAT vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison
WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAT Waters Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 6.69% | 6.96% | 6.53% | 4.86% | 4.21% | 3.95% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 4.26% | 4.79% | 4.57% | 4.22% |
Drawdowns
WAT vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAT drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAT and VZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WAT vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison
Waters Corporation (WAT) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 5.68%. This indicates that WAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WAT vs. VZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waters Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities