PortfoliosLab logo
WAT vs. WAB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WAT and WAB is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

WAT vs. WAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waters Corporation (WAT) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WAT:

0.12

WAB:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

WAT:

0.86

WAB:

1.17

Omega Ratio

WAT:

1.10

WAB:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

WAT:

0.40

WAB:

0.93

Martin Ratio

WAT:

1.18

WAB:

2.81

Ulcer Index

WAT:

11.17%

WAB:

7.83%

Daily Std Dev

WAT:

37.89%

WAB:

28.21%

Max Drawdown

WAT:

-80.12%

WAB:

-71.84%

Current Drawdown

WAT:

-13.66%

WAB:

-4.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WAT:

$20.47B

WAB:

$32.96B

EPS

WAT:

$11.01

WAB:

$6.39

PE Ratio

WAT:

31.25

WAB:

30.14

PEG Ratio

WAT:

2.28

WAB:

3.92

PS Ratio

WAT:

6.86

WAB:

3.14

PB Ratio

WAT:

10.48

WAB:

3.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

WAT:

$2.98B

WAB:

$10.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WAT:

$1.85B

WAB:

$3.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

WAT:

$995.26M

WAB:

$2.02B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAT achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than WAB's 6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WAT has outperformed WAB with an annualized return of 10.91%, while WAB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.79% annualized return.


WAT

YTD

-1.16%

1M

12.75%

6M

-3.70%

1Y

4.43%

5Y*

15.51%

10Y*

10.91%

WAB

YTD

6.15%

1M

17.02%

6M

0.14%

1Y

19.97%

5Y*

32.54%

10Y*

7.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WAT vs. WAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAT is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAT is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAT is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAT is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAT is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

WAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAB is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAB is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAB is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAB is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAB is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAB is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WAT vs. WAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waters Corporation (WAT) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the WAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAT and WAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WAT vs. WAB - Dividend Comparison

WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
0.42%0.42%0.54%0.60%0.52%0.66%0.62%0.68%0.54%0.43%0.39%0.23%

Drawdowns

WAT vs. WAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAT drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than WAB's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAT and WAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WAT vs. WAB - Volatility Comparison

Waters Corporation (WAT) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) at 8.64%. This indicates that WAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WAT vs. WAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waters Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
661.71M
2.61B
(WAT) Total Revenue
(WAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WAT vs. WAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Waters Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
74.5%
34.5%
(WAT) Gross Margin
(WAB) Gross Margin
WAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waters Corporation reported a gross profit of 493.15M and revenue of 661.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

WAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 900.00M and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

WAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waters Corporation reported an operating income of 151.75M and revenue of 661.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.9%.

WAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 474.00M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

WAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waters Corporation reported a net income of 121.38M and revenue of 661.71M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.

WAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 322.00M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.