WAT vs. CMI

In the year-to-date period, WAT achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than CMI's 50.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WAT having a 12.42% annualized return and CMI not far behind at 12.32%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waters Corporation (WAT) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the CMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAT and CMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.

The maximum WAT drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than CMI's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAT and CMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Waters Corporation (WAT) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Cummins Inc. (CMI) at 5.83%. This indicates that WAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waters Corporation and Cummins Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.