WAR vs. CBON

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WAR (U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF) and CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by US Global, while CBON is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index. WAR is actively managed, while CBON is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. WAR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CBON.

Performance

WAR vs. CBON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAR

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -6.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBON

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 5.05%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: 2.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAR vs. CBON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAR U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF	-6.13%
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WAR and CBON is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.16

Return for Risk

WAR vs. CBON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBON

CBON Risk / Return Rank: 89
CBON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CBON Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CBON Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CBON Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CBON Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAR vs. CBON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAR	CBON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	22.55	—

Drawdowns

WAR vs. CBON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAR drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum CBON drawdown of -14.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAR and CBON.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAR	CBON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.13%	-14.13%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.02%	-0.75%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-3.97%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAR	CBON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.88%	3.45%	+48.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.88%	4.92%	+46.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.88%	5.56%	+46.32%

WAR vs. CBON - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CBON's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAR vs. CBON - Dividend Comparison

WAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF	1.53%	1.66%	2.15%	3.01%	2.70%	3.05%	2.87%	3.87%	3.39%	3.33%	3.25%	2.78%
WAR U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAR and CBON in my portfolio?

WAR and CBON have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAR or CBON?

On fees, CBON is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAR or CBON?

CBON is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAR or CBON?

CBON has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for WAR.

What is the main difference between WAR and CBON?

WAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while CBON is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: US Global and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WAR and 0.50% for CBON.