PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAR vs. ARKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAR vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAR

1D
-4.72%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARKX

1D
-1.68%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
13.18%
6M
8.86%
1Y
46.62%
3Y*
32.05%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAR vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAR and ARKX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.75

WAR vs. ARKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WAR
ARKX

Technology

55.6%
27.0%

Industrials

39.8%
56.2%

Financial Services

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

-5.0%
7.6%

Technology

WAR
55.6%
ARKX
27.0%

Industrials

WAR
39.8%
ARKX
56.2%

Financial Services

WAR
2.7%
ARKX

-

Basic Materials

WAR

-

ARKX
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WAR

-

ARKX
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

WAR

-

ARKX

-

Energy

WAR

-

ARKX

-

Healthcare

WAR

-

ARKX
1.7%

Real Estate

WAR

-

ARKX

-

Utilities

WAR

-

ARKX

-

Communication Services

WAR
-5.0%
ARKX
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAR vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ARKX
ARKX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAR vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WARARKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

WAR vs. ARKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAR vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAR drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAR and ARKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARARKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-43.61%

+30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.38%

-13.09%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-19.87%

+14.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

Volatility

WAR vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARARKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.90%

33.88%

+19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.90%

28.15%

+24.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.90%

27.71%

+25.19%

WAR vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAR vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAR nor ARKX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WAR and ARKX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.

WAR and ARKX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: US Global and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WAR and 0.75% for ARKX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAR and ARKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer