PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAR vs. JETS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAR vs. JETS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAR

1D
-4.72%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JETS

1D
0.65%
1M
14.93%
YTD
11.08%
6M
9.61%
1Y
42.95%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAR vs. JETS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAR and JETS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.28

WAR vs. JETS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WAR
JETS

Technology

55.6%
2.3%

Industrials

39.8%
90.5%

Financial Services

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

-5.0%

-

Technology

WAR
55.6%
JETS
2.3%

Industrials

WAR
39.8%
JETS
90.5%

Financial Services

WAR
2.7%
JETS

-

Basic Materials

WAR

-

JETS

-

Consumer Cyclical

WAR

-

JETS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

WAR

-

JETS

-

Energy

WAR

-

JETS

-

Healthcare

WAR

-

JETS

-

Real Estate

WAR

-

JETS

-

Utilities

WAR

-

JETS

-

Communication Services

WAR
-5.0%
JETS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAR vs. JETS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


JETS
JETS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAR vs. JETS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WARJETSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

WAR vs. JETS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAR vs. JETS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAR drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum JETS drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAR and JETS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARJETSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-64.92%

+51.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.38%

-7.46%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-25.12%

+19.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.46%

Volatility

WAR vs. JETS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARJETSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.90%

33.15%

+19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.90%

32.54%

+20.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.90%

34.23%

+18.67%

WAR vs. JETS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WAR and JETS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

WAR vs. JETS - Dividend Comparison

WAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
0.75%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%0.04%1.24%0.09%1.57%0.58%0.17%
WAR
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAR and JETS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAR and JETS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for WAR.

WAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while JETS is Industrials Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAR and JETS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer