PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. UMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WANT vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.95% return, which is significantly lower than UMDD's 41.42% return.


WANT

1D
0.66%
1M
-7.09%
YTD
-14.95%
6M
-17.60%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
-6.22%
10Y*

UMDD

1D
2.20%
1M
10.73%
YTD
41.42%
6M
35.75%
1Y
66.43%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-14.95%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%84.81%45.26%90.07%-24.44%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
41.42%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-31.45%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and UMDD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018

0.77

The correlation between WANT and UMDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

WANT vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WANT
UMDD

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
5.1%

Communication Services

0.2%
0.5%

Technology

0.2%
9.0%

Industrials

0.0%
13.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.2%

Energy

-

2.7%

Financial Services

-

7.1%

Healthcare

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WANT
18.4%
UMDD
5.1%

Communication Services

WANT
0.2%
UMDD
0.5%

Technology

WANT
0.2%
UMDD
9.0%

Industrials

WANT
0.0%
UMDD
13.4%

Basic Materials

WANT

-

UMDD
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

WANT

-

UMDD
2.2%

Energy

WANT

-

UMDD
2.7%

Financial Services

WANT

-

UMDD
7.1%

Healthcare

WANT

-

UMDD
4.8%

Real Estate

WANT

-

UMDD
3.9%

Utilities

WANT

-

UMDD
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WANTUMDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.24

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

2.56

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

8.58

-8.06

WANT vs. UMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and UMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WANT vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, roughly equal to the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and UMDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTUMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-86.24%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-26.04%

-15.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.53%

-60.33%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

-64.61%

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.01%

-3.15%

-55.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.11%

-23.58%

-19.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.68%

7.78%

+7.90%

Volatility

WANT vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 18.43% compared to ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) at 14.80%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WANTUMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.43%

14.80%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.93%

35.26%

+4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.30%

47.64%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.78%

59.05%

+11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.47%

62.32%

+9.15%

WANT vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than UMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

WANT vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than UMDD's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.74%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.63%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WANT and UMDD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WANT has higher volatility (18.43%) compared to UMDD (14.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs UMDD's -86.24%.

On 5-year performance, UMDD leads with 2.41% vs -6.22% for WANT. On fees, UMDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 14.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 2.41% return vs -6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.63% for WANT.

WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.95% for UMDD.

UMDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WANT and UMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer