WANT vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WANT is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -8.57%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for QTJL. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

WANT vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -18.75% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 3.14% return.

WANT

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: -1.79%
• 6M: -23.75%
• YTD: -18.75%
• 1Y: -4.72%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: -8.57%
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -3.77%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	-18.75%	-6.94%	60.52%	114.43%	-83.03%	42.79%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	3.14%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and QTJL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.80

The correlation between WANT and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WANT	QTJL
Consumer Cyclical	99.0%	11.6%
Technology	0.9%	58.0%
Communication Services	0.3%	14.5%
Industrials	0.1%	2.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

WANT vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT

WANT Risk / Return Rank: 10
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 45
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WANT	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.11	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	1.60	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.22	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	1.77	-1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	8.67	-8.94

WANT vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WANT vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WANT	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-33.40%	-52.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.27%	-6.68%	-34.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.53%	-22.43%	-41.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.89%	-33.40%	-52.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.84%	-4.09%	-56.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.31%	-7.77%	-35.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.44%	1.37%	+16.07%

Volatility

WANT vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 4.26%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WANT	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.27%	4.26%	+13.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.82%	8.46%	+33.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.32%	10.68%	+44.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.13%	20.34%	+50.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.33%	20.26%	+51.07%

WANT vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

WANT vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	0.54%	0.65%	0.61%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WANT and QTJL in my portfolio?

WANT and QTJL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WANT or QTJL?

WANT has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to QTJL (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, WANT or QTJL?

On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.52% vs -8.57% for WANT. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WANT or QTJL?

Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.52% return vs -8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WANT or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WANT or QTJL?

WANT has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between WANT and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.