PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WANT vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WANT vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.58% return.


WANT

1D
5.55%
1M
0.14%
6M
-18.34%
YTD
-14.35%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
-8.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.92%

QTAP

1D
0.89%
1M
1.04%
6M
13.63%
YTD
14.58%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$233.87K$224.64K$223.31K
$2.02M$1.30M$1.32M

WANT vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-14.35%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%68.40%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
14.58%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.95%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and QTAP is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.78

The correlation between WANT and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WANT
QTAP

Consumer Cyclical

19.7%
12.5%

Communication Services

0.4%
15.8%

Technology

0.2%
50.7%

Industrials

0.1%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.7%

Energy

-

0.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WANT
19.7%
QTAP
12.5%

Communication Services

WANT
0.4%
QTAP
15.8%

Technology

WANT
0.2%
QTAP
50.7%

Industrials

WANT
0.1%
QTAP
3.3%

Basic Materials

WANT

-

QTAP
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

WANT

-

QTAP
8.7%

Energy

WANT

-

QTAP
0.7%

Financial Services

WANT

-

QTAP
0.2%

Healthcare

WANT

-

QTAP
5.1%

Real Estate

WANT

-

QTAP
0.1%

Utilities

WANT

-

QTAP
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WANT vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WANT vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WANTQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.77

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

7.63

-7.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

36.59

-36.19

WANT vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WANT vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WANTQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-29.44%

-56.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-2.81%

-38.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.53%

-13.03%

-50.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.89%

-29.44%

-56.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.72%

-0.17%

-58.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.42%

-4.91%

-38.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.70%

0.59%

+18.11%

Volatility

WANT vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.84%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WANTQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.32%

2.84%

+19.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.85%

5.74%

+39.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.50%

6.61%

+50.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.48%

18.93%

+52.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.45%

18.57%

+52.88%

WANT vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

WANT vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.52%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


WANT and QTAP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WANT has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to QTAP (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.44% vs -8.28% for WANT. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.44% return vs -8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

WANT has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.79% for QTAP.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WANT and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer