WANT vs. NUGT
WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -8.98%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for NUGT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
WANT vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -17.53% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -37.58% return.
WANT
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- -26.34%
- YTD
- -17.53%
- 1Y
- -5.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- -8.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- 6M
- -50.47%
- YTD
- -37.58%
- 1Y
- 52.80%
- 3Y*
- 44.99%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- -15.01%
WANT vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -17.53% | -6.94% | 60.52% | 114.43% | -83.03% | 84.81% | 45.26% | 90.07% | -24.44% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -37.58% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | 26.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WANT and NUGT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018 | 0.16 |
The correlation between WANT and NUGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WANT vs. NUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WANT
NUGT
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
WANT
NUGT
-
Technology
WANT
NUGT
-
Communication Services
WANT
NUGT
-
Industrials
WANT
NUGT
-
Basic Materials
WANT
-
NUGT
Consumer Defensive
WANT
-
NUGT
-
Energy
WANT
-
NUGT
-
Financial Services
WANT
-
NUGT
-
Healthcare
WANT
-
NUGT
-
Real Estate
WANT
-
NUGT
-
Utilities
WANT
-
NUGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WANT vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
WANT
NUGT
WANT vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WANT | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.82 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 1.75 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WANT vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WANT | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -99.97% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.27% | -64.82% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.53% | -64.82% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.89% | -73.72% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.25% | -99.85% | +39.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.28% | -91.56% | +48.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 30.29% | -13.07% |
Volatility
WANT vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) is 17.06%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a volatility of 27.51%. This indicates that WANT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WANT | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.06% | 27.51% | -10.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.67% | 80.24% | -38.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.21% | 95.08% | -39.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.13% | 73.31% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.35% | 87.69% | -16.34% |
WANT vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
WANT vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than NUGT's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.63% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WANT and NUGT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (27.51%) compared to WANT (17.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs NUGT's -99.97%.
On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 14.43% vs -8.98% for WANT. On fees, WANT is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, WANT has been the lower-risk option at 17.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 14.43% return vs -8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WANT is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.54% for WANT.
WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WANT and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer