WAMCX vs. EMCAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WAMCX (Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX returned 12.27%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for EMCAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAMCX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.

Performance

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAMCX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX has outperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.

WAMCX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 4.32%
• 1Y: 17.44%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: -3.87%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

EMCAX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	7.13%	-2.85%	8.25%	19.19%	-39.71%	5.23%	71.48%	38.09%	10.34%	31.60%
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	11.03%	2.37%	13.89%	12.43%	-16.06%	16.07%	27.81%	19.10%	-4.64%	21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMCX and EMCAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 1995	0.78

The correlation between WAMCX and EMCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WAMCX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMCX

WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 12
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

EMCAX

EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 23
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WAMCX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.20	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.85	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.21	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.98	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.76	7.46	-3.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAMCX and EMCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WAMCX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	1.20	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.24	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.53	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.46	-0.07

Drawdowns

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMCX drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than EMCAX's maximum drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMCX and EMCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMCX	EMCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.51%	-51.81%	-14.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.89%	-8.60%	-8.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.21%	-19.19%	-14.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.18%	-30.60%	-22.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.18%	-42.79%	-10.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.01%	-2.58%	-25.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.15%	-13.27%	-1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	2.28%	+2.85%

Volatility

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.64%. This indicates that WAMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WAMCX	EMCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	4.64%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.89%	11.27%	+4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.33%	14.15%	+7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.39%	18.17%	+9.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.62%	20.24%	+5.38%

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMCX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMCX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	0.12%	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.08%	2.99%	1.96%	7.65%	11.92%	11.44%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMCX and EMCAX in my portfolio?

WAMCX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WAMCX or EMCAX?

WAMCX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to EMCAX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMCX dropped -66.51% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.