WAMA vs. WTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WAMA is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index, while WTV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WAMA is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.

Performance

WAMA vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAMA

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTV

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 22.34%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.33%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and WTV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

WAMA vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 61
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAMA	WTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.16	—

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and WTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMA	WTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-42.18%	+37.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.20%	-1.54%	-1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-5.03%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAMA	WTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	11.90%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.24%	17.08%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	20.16%	-5.92%

WAMA vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMA vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMA and WTV in my portfolio?

WAMA and WTV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAMA or WTV?

On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAMA or WTV?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for WAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAMA or WTV?

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

What is the main difference between WAMA and WTV?

WAMA is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while WTV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.12% for WTV.