WAMA vs. THRO
WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and THRO (iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WAMA is passively managed, while THRO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for THRO.
Performance
WAMA vs. THRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA vs. THRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 2.77% |
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMA and THRO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMA vs. THRO — Risk / Return Rank
WAMA
THRO
WAMA vs. THRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAMA | THRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.87 | 0.75 | +4.12 |
Drawdowns
WAMA vs. THRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum THRO drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and THRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMA | THRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -26.54% | +24.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.55% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -6.69% | +6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility
WAMA vs. THRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMA | THRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.20% | 13.00% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 18.72% | -9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 18.72% | -9.52% |
WAMA vs. THRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than THRO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMA vs. THRO - Dividend Comparison
WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.90% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, WAMA and THRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for THRO.
THRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.60% for THRO.
Find the right allocation for WAMA and THRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer