WAMA vs. RHTX
WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WAMA is passively managed, while RHTX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RHTX.
Performance
WAMA vs. RHTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAMA
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHTX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA vs. RHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.33% |
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF | -1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMA and RHTX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMA vs. RHTX — Risk / Return Rank
WAMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHTX
WAMA vs. RHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAMA | RHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAMA vs. RHTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum RHTX drawdown of -24.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and RHTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMA | RHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -24.68% | +20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -4.38% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -9.55% | +8.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility
WAMA vs. RHTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMA | RHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 15.77% | -1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 18.06% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 18.06% | -3.82% |
WAMA vs. RHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RHTX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMA vs. RHTX - Dividend Comparison
Neither WAMA nor RHTX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WAMA and RHTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.
WAMA and RHTX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 1.38% for RHTX.
Find the right allocation for WAMA and RHTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer