WAMA vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WAMA is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WAMA is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

WAMA vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAMA

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	2.77%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and GDMN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

WAMA vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WAMA	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.87	0.80	+4.07

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMA	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-52.82%	+50.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-37.06%	+36.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-18.89%	+18.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAMA	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	51.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.20%	61.32%	-52.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.20%	47.59%	-38.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.20%	47.59%	-38.39%

WAMA vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMA vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMA and GDMN in my portfolio?

WAMA and GDMN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAMA or GDMN?

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAMA or GDMN?

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAMA or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

What is the main difference between WAMA and GDMN?

WAMA is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.45% for GDMN.