PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAMA vs. EPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAMA vs. EPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAMA

1D
-0.73%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EPI

1D
-1.40%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-8.12%
1Y
-9.55%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and EPI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAMA vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMA

EPI
EPI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAMA vs. EPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAMAEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.87

0.13

+4.74

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and EPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAMAEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-66.21%

+64.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-17.83%

+17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-18.65%

+18.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

Volatility

WAMA vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAMAEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

14.94%

-5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.20%

16.21%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.20%

20.35%

-11.15%

WAMA vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAMA vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAMA nor EPI has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.15%6.01%1.18%0.78%1.17%1.18%0.85%1.05%1.20%
WAMA
WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAMA and EPI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

WAMA and EPI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

WAMA is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while EPI is Asia Pacific Equities. WAMA tracks WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index, while EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.84% for EPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAMA and EPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer