PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAMA vs. ELM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAMA vs. ELM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAMA

1D
-0.73%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ELM

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.88%
YTD
7.56%
6M
8.51%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and ELM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAMA vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMA

ELM
ELM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAMA vs. ELM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAMAELMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.87

1.49

+3.38

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum ELM drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and ELM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAMAELMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-9.02%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.58%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-1.32%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

WAMA vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAMAELMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

9.38%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.20%

10.27%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.20%

10.27%

-1.07%

WAMA vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAMA vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison

WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WAMA and ELM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for WAMA.

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Elm. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.24% for ELM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAMA and ELM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer