PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAGOX vs. LVAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund (WAGOX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAGOX achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WAGOX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.


WAGOX

1D
-1.02%
1M
1.04%
YTD
3.73%
6M
1.58%
1Y
-1.25%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
-0.64%
10Y*
9.37%

LVAFX

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.69%
YTD
13.05%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAGOX
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund
3.73%-4.58%6.60%25.57%-35.02%21.43%42.27%33.11%-7.41%37.73%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.05%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between WAGOX and LVAFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.68

The correlation between WAGOX and LVAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAGOX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAGOX
WAGOX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
WAGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
WAGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund (WAGOX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAGOXLVAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.56

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

4.48

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

17.21

-17.19

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAGOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAGOX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAGOXLVAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

3.04

-3.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.62

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.55

+0.11

Drawdowns

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGOX drawdown since its inception was -44.05%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGOX and LVAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAGOXLVAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.05%

-33.69%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-5.76%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-17.52%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.05%

-18.34%

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.05%

-33.69%

-10.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.90%

-0.39%

-19.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-4.75%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.14%

1.50%

+5.64%

Volatility

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund (WAGOX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.05%. This indicates that WAGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAGOXLVAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

2.05%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

6.11%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

8.50%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

13.23%

+7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

13.58%

+7.03%

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGOX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAGOX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

WAGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, which matches LVAFX's 9.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
9.00%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%
WAGOX
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund
9.00%9.34%8.83%0.00%2.30%7.98%1.96%8.64%18.77%11.04%9.13%13.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAGOX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAGOX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to LVAFX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAGOX dropped -44.05% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAGOX and LVAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer