WAGN vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

WAGN vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAGN

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: 4.68%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.19%
• 1Y: 20.50%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAGN vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	6.70%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WAGN and WBIF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

WAGN vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGN vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WAGN	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.29	+0.85

Drawdowns

WAGN vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -5.79%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAGN	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-20.29%	+14.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-2.54%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-7.73%	+5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAGN	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	12.45%	+7.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.75%	12.88%	+6.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.75%	12.36%	+7.39%

WAGN vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAGN vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

WAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAGN and WBIF in my portfolio?

WAGN and WBIF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAGN or WBIF?

On fees, WAGN is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAGN or WBIF?

WAGN is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAGN or WBIF?

WBIF has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for WAGN.

What is the main difference between WAGN and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 1.25% for WBIF.