WAGN vs. BNO
WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - WAGN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Pabrai, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. WAGN is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
WAGN vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAGN
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -21.60%
- YTD
- 52.26%
- 6M
- 50.77%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
WAGN vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 3.33% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 34.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAGN and BNO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAGN vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
WAGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNO
WAGN vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAGN | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAGN vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -7.02%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAGN | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -87.06% | +80.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | -28.29% | +21.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -40.10% | +37.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.51% | — |
Volatility
WAGN vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAGN | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 41.73% | -22.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 35.65% | -16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 36.71% | -17.40% |
WAGN vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAGN vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither WAGN nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WAGN and BNO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAGN is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAGN is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
WAGN and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 1.00% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for WAGN and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer