WAGN vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WAGN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Pabrai, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. WAGN is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

WAGN vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAGN

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAGN vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	3.33%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WAGN and ISCMF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026	-0.06

Return for Risk

WAGN vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAGN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 77
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGN vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAGN	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.95	—

Drawdowns

WAGN vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -7.02%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAGN	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-25.42%	+18.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-5.26%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-13.36%	+10.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAGN	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	17.87%	+1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	14.29%	+5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	14.29%	+5.02%

WAGN vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAGN vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAGN nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAGN and ISCMF in my portfolio?

WAGN and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAGN or ISCMF?

On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAGN or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAGN or ISCMF?

WAGN and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WAGN and ISCMF?

WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.19% for ISCMF.