WAGN vs. FAAR
WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WAGN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Pabrai, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
WAGN vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAGN
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.28%
WAGN vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.36% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAGN and FAAR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAGN vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
WAGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAAR
WAGN vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAGN | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAGN vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAGN | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -18.03% | +16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -8.54% | +8.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -7.83% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility
WAGN vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAGN | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.76% | 12.86% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 11.89% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 11.54% | +0.22% |
WAGN vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAGN vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
WAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.84% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAGN and FAAR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAGN is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAGN is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.84%, compared with 0.00% for WAGN.
WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.95% for FAAR.
Find the right allocation for WAGN and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer