WAGN vs. DWAS
WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WAGN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Pabrai, while DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. WAGN is actively managed, while DWAS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DWAS.
Performance
WAGN vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAGN
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DWAS
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 41.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.17%
WAGN vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.36% |
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAGN and DWAS is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAGN vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank
WAGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DWAS
WAGN vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAGN | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAGN vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum DWAS drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and DWAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAGN | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -46.16% | +44.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -6.05% | +5.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -10.24% | +9.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility
WAGN vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAGN | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.76% | 24.94% | -13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 25.83% | -14.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 26.77% | -15.01% |
WAGN vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAGN vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison
Neither WAGN nor DWAS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAGN and DWAS have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DWAS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DWAS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.
WAGN and DWAS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.60% for DWAS.
Find the right allocation for WAGN and DWAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer