PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAEMX vs. WMCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAEMX achieves a 22.94% return, which is significantly higher than WMCVX's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, WAEMX has underperformed WMCVX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while WMCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.


WAEMX

1D
-3.24%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
22.94%
6M
22.22%
1Y
29.67%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
8.64%

WMCVX

1D
-0.89%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.38%
6M
8.48%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
22.94%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
11.38%-3.66%11.65%31.78%-21.61%25.23%12.52%23.63%-9.55%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WAEMX and WMCVX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.55

The correlation between WAEMX and WMCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAEMX vs. WMCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

WMCVX
WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WAEMXWMCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

1.22

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.13

3.38

+8.75

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the WMCVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAEMX and WMCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, roughly equal to the maximum WMCVX drawdown of -65.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAEMX and WMCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAEMXWMCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-65.79%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-12.06%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-28.75%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-32.26%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-46.29%

+1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-3.63%

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.78%

-10.94%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.34%

-1.65%

Volatility

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) at 5.29%. This indicates that WAEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAEMXWMCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

5.29%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

13.84%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

18.90%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

22.58%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

23.48%

-5.21%

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAEMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than WMCVX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAEMX vs. WMCVX - Dividend Comparison

WAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.26%, more than WMCVX's 5.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
57.26%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
5.56%6.19%17.18%3.67%2.39%7.72%0.00%1.10%8.98%6.63%0.07%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAEMX and WMCVX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAEMX has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to WMCVX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAEMX dropped -66.35% vs WMCVX's -65.79%.

WAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAEMX and WMCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer