PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WABF vs. BNDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WABF vs. BNDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) and Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WABF vs. BNDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WABF
Western Asset Bond ETF
-0.24%8.06%
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
0.75%8.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WABF achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than BNDS's 0.75% return.


WABF

1D
0.60%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.84%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDS

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.75%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WABF vs. BNDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WABF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDS's 0.81% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WABF vs. BNDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WABF
WABF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WABF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
WABF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDS
BNDS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BNDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WABF vs. BNDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) and Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WABFBNDSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

1.61

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

2.15

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.69

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.51

7.27

-2.76

WABF vs. BNDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WABF Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the BNDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WABF and BNDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WABFBNDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.61

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

1.38

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between WABF and BNDS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WABF vs. BNDS - Dividend Comparison

WABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than BNDS's 8.11% yield.


TTM202520242023
WABF
Western Asset Bond ETF
5.10%5.67%6.25%1.46%
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
8.11%7.98%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WABF vs. BNDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WABF drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, smaller than the maximum BNDS drawdown of -6.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WABF and BNDS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WABFBNDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-6.96%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.57%

-5.44%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-2.63%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-0.88%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.26%

-0.21%

Volatility

WABF vs. BNDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) is 1.59%, while Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that WABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WABFBNDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

1.86%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

2.73%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

5.82%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.17%

5.48%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.17%

5.48%

+0.69%