PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDS vs. BNDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDS vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDS achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly higher than BNDP's -0.46% return.


BNDS

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.77%
6M
1.77%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.21%

BNDP

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.08%
6M
-0.62%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$504.98K$475.70K$762.42K
$2.24M$2.01M$1.56M

BNDS vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNDS and BNDP is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDS vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNDS
BNDS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BNDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNDS vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDSBNDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

BNDS vs. BNDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDS vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDS drawdown since its inception was -6.96%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDS and BNDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDSBNDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-2.60%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-2.10%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.98%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

Volatility

BNDS vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDSBNDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

3.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

3.65%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.09%

3.65%

+1.44%

BNDS vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDS vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison

BNDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than BNDP's 2.47% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BNDS and BNDP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BNDS.

BNDS has the higher dividend yield at 8.11%, compared with 2.47% for BNDP.

They also come from different issuers: InfraCap and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BNDS and 0.05% for BNDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDS and BNDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer