PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDS vs. BOND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDS vs. BOND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDS vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
0.75%8.30%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
-0.02%8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDS achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's -0.02% return.


BNDS

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.75%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOND

1D
0.25%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDS vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNDS vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDS
BNDS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BNDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BOND
BOND Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDS vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDSBONDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.08

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.51

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.58

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.27

4.65

+2.62

BNDS vs. BOND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BOND Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDS and BOND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDSBONDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.08

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.63

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between BNDS and BOND is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BNDS vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison

BNDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than BOND's 5.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDS
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
8.11%7.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
5.18%5.11%5.02%4.06%3.44%2.58%2.66%3.38%3.18%2.87%2.85%4.14%

Drawdowns

BNDS vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDS drawdown since its inception was -6.96%, smaller than the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDS and BOND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDSBONDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-19.71%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.44%

-3.29%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-2.06%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-3.53%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.12%

+0.14%

Volatility

BNDS vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison

Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) have volatilities of 1.86% and 1.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDSBONDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.82%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

2.70%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

4.72%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.48%

5.73%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

5.07%

+0.41%