WABF vs. APCB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB).

WABF and APCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WABF is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023. APCB is an actively managed fund by ActivePassive. It was launched on May 2, 2023.

Performance

WABF vs. APCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WABF vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WABF Western Asset Bond ETF	-0.24%	7.92%	1.30%	6.81%
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	-0.22%	6.87%	1.45%	5.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WABF achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than APCB's -0.22% return.

WABF

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APCB

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WABF vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WABF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than APCB's 0.36% expense ratio.

APCB

ActivePassive Core Bond ETF

WABF

Western Asset Bond ETF

Return for Risk

WABF vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WABF

WABF Risk / Return Rank: 50
WABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
WABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
WABF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
WABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
WABF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

APCB

APCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WABF vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WABF	APCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.05	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	1.47	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.19	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	1.70	-0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	5.23	-0.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WABF vs. APCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WABF Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the APCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WABF and APCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WABF	APCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.05	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.67	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between WABF and APCB is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WABF vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison

WABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than APCB's 4.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WABF Western Asset Bond ETF	5.10%	5.67%	6.25%	1.46%
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	4.32%	4.35%	4.74%	2.22%

Drawdowns

WABF vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WABF drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, smaller than the maximum APCB drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WABF and APCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	WABF	APCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-6.42%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.57%	-2.51%	-1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-1.91%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-1.51%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.82%	+0.23%

Volatility

WABF vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Bond ETF (WABF) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) at 1.48%. This indicates that WABF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WABF	APCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.59%	1.48%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	2.32%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.85%	3.90%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.17%	4.91%	+1.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.17%	4.91%	+1.26%