VZLA vs. SVM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VZLA (Vizsla Silver Corp) and SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — VZLA in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, SVM in Silver. Over the past year, VZLA returned 6.99% vs 175.20% for SVM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

VZLA vs. SVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vizsla Silver Corp (VZLA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZLA achieves a -35.65% return, which is significantly lower than SVM's 34.07% return.

VZLA

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: -35.65%
• 6M: -39.10%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SVM

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -5.48%
• YTD: 34.07%
• 6M: 25.35%
• 1Y: 175.20%
• 3Y*: 60.32%
• 5Y*: 15.62%
• 10Y*: 18.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VZLA vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VZLA Vizsla Silver Corp	-35.65%	219.88%	-1.72%
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	34.07%	179.29%	-16.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VZLA and SVM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024	0.69

The correlation between VZLA and SVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VZLA : $1.22B SVM : $2.47B
EPS VZLA : -CA$0.48 SVM : -$0.05
PB Ratio VZLA : 3.58 SVM : 2.62
Total Revenue (TTM) VZLA : CA$0.00 SVM : $437.11M
Gross Profit (TTM) VZLA : -CA$155.21K SVM : $254.02M
EBITDA (TTM) VZLA : -CA$32.64M SVM : $185.32M

Return for Risk

VZLA vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VZLA

VZLA Risk / Return Rank: 46
VZLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VZLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VZLA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
VZLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
VZLA Martin Ratio Rank: 45

SVM

SVM Risk / Return Rank: 89
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VZLA vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vizsla Silver Corp (VZLA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VZLA	SVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	2.53	-2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	2.66	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	4.52	-4.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.23	12.86	-12.63

VZLA vs. SVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZLA Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the SVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZLA and SVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VZLA vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZLA drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, smaller than the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZLA and SVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VZLA	SVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.27%	-98.00%	+41.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.27%	-39.02%	-17.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.69%	-43.51%	-5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.58%	-71.61%	+55.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.93%	13.68%	+16.25%

Volatility

VZLA vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vizsla Silver Corp (VZLA) is 22.92%, while Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a volatility of 27.04%. This indicates that VZLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VZLA	SVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.92%	27.04%	-4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.99%	57.25%	-4.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.49%	69.95%	-2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.74%	55.86%	+7.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.74%	61.86%	+1.88%

Dividends

VZLA vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison

VZLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	0.22%	0.30%	0.83%	0.95%	0.84%	0.66%	0.37%	0.44%	1.19%	0.76%	0.43%	2.13%
VZLA Vizsla Silver Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VZLA and SVM in my portfolio?

VZLA and SVM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VZLA or SVM?

SVM has higher volatility (27.04%) compared to VZLA (22.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZLA dropped -56.27% vs SVM's -98.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.