PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VZLA vs. SVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VZLA vs. SVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vizsla Silver Corp (VZLA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZLA achieves a -42.60% return, which is significantly lower than SVM's 12.34% return.


VZLA

1D
-3.09%
1M
-5.99%
6M
-38.19%
YTD
-42.60%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
32.32%

SVM

1D
-2.90%
1M
-8.86%
6M
-6.96%
YTD
12.34%
1Y
117.26%
3Y*
46.35%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
11.84%
ALL TIME*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.52M$23.31M$40.20M
$15.55M$17.20M$20.11M

VZLA vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VZLA
Vizsla Silver Corp
-42.60%219.88%-1.72%
SVM
Silvercorp Metals Inc.
12.34%179.29%-16.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VZLA and SVM is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2024

0.70

The correlation between VZLA and SVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VZLA:

$1.10B

SVM:

$2.07B

EPS

VZLA:

-CA$0.16

SVM:

-$0.05

PB Ratio

VZLA:

2.54

SVM:

2.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

VZLA:

CA$0.00

SVM:

$437.11M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VZLA:

-CA$172.44K

SVM:

$254.02M

EBITDA (TTM)

VZLA:

-CA$44.53M

SVM:

$185.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VZLA vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VZLA
VZLA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VZLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZLA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VZLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZLA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SVM
SVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VZLA vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vizsla Silver Corp (VZLA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VZLASVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

2.64

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

6.28

-6.08

VZLA vs. SVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZLA Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the SVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZLA and SVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZLA vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZLA drawdown since its inception was -56.85%, smaller than the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZLA and SVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VZLASVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.85%

-98.00%

+41.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.85%

-43.80%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.23%

-52.66%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-71.50%

+52.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.69%

18.35%

+16.34%

Volatility

VZLA vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison

Vizsla Silver Corp (VZLA) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) have volatilities of 17.32% and 16.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VZLASVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.32%

16.71%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.16%

56.42%

-6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.98%

70.30%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.52%

56.25%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.52%

61.44%

+2.08%

Dividends

VZLA vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison

VZLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SVM
Silvercorp Metals Inc.
0.27%0.30%0.83%0.95%0.84%0.66%0.37%0.44%1.19%0.76%0.43%2.13%
VZLA
Vizsla Silver Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VZLA vs. SVM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vizsla Silver Corp and Silvercorp Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VZLA and SVM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VZLA has higher volatility (17.32%) compared to SVM (16.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZLA dropped -56.85% vs SVM's -98.00%.

SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZLA and SVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer