PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VZ vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VZ vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZ achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 15.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VZ has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 4.44%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


VZ

1D
2.49%
1M
2.23%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.44%

XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.99%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VZ vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
21.97%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VZ and XLB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000

0.37

The correlation between VZ and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VZ vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VZ vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VZXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.65

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

5.05

-2.00

VZ vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZ and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZ vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZ drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZ and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VZXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-59.83%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-12.38%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-23.17%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.38%

-24.72%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

-37.27%

-3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-2.25%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-10.83%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

4.04%

+2.19%

Volatility

VZ vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) have volatilities of 6.87% and 7.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VZXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

7.05%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

13.58%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

17.49%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

19.06%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

20.70%

-0.34%

Dividends

VZ vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than XLB's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.75%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


VZ and XLB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to VZ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZ dropped -50.66% vs XLB's -59.83%.

XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZ and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer