PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VZ vs. SMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VZ vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZ achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly lower than SMHX's 51.09% return.


VZ

1D
-0.87%
1M
12.34%
6M
2.05%
YTD
19.82%
1Y
16.34%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
4.02%
ALL TIME*
5.08%

SMHX

1D
-2.08%
1M
-4.66%
6M
53.35%
YTD
51.09%
1Y
68.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
52.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.05M$5.75M$8.39M
$1.41B$1.23B$1.26B

VZ vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
19.82%8.86%-2.02%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
51.09%30.00%15.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VZ and SMHX is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VZ vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VZ vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VZSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.76

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

8.39

-6.22

VZ vs. SMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the SMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZ and SMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZ vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZ drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than SMHX's maximum drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZ and SMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VZSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-38.53%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.05%

-24.93%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-15.33%

+8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-7.77%

-7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

8.17%

-0.62%

Volatility

VZ vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) is 8.19%, while VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a volatility of 14.71%. This indicates that VZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VZSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

14.71%

-6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

33.60%

-16.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

39.89%

-14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

42.10%

-19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

42.10%

-21.44%

Dividends

VZ vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison

VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than SMHX's 0.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
0.02%0.02%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
6.01%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


VZ and SMHX have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMHX has higher volatility (14.71%) compared to VZ (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZ dropped -50.66% vs SMHX's -38.53%.

SMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZ and SMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer