VXUS vs. GDXJ
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXUS returned 10.22%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VXUS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 10.22%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -10.41%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 49.74%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.69% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXUS and GDXJ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.36 |
The correlation between VXUS and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXUS
GDXJ
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Technology
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Industrials
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
VXUS
GDXJ
Healthcare
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Energy
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Utilities
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
VXUS
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXUS vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
VXUS
GDXJ
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXUS | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.30 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 3.55 | +6.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXUS | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -88.66% | +52.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -39.47% | +28.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -39.47% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -48.79% | +19.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -57.77% | +21.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -33.25% | +31.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -60.45% | +52.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 14.41% | -11.48% |
Volatility
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is 6.71%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 19.46%. This indicates that VXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXUS | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 19.46% | -12.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 43.41% | -29.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 51.54% | -35.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 41.50% | -25.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 44.23% | -27.03% |
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
VXUS vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than GDXJ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.67% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXUS and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to VXUS (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 12.00% vs 10.22% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.54% for GDXJ.
VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.52% for GDXJ.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXUS and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer