PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXF vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXF vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VXF has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 12.32%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.


VXF

1D
0.44%
1M
4.74%
YTD
14.37%
6M
12.25%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
12.32%

MOAT

1D
0.41%
1M
3.44%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXF vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
14.37%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.66%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VXF and MOAT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.84

The correlation between VXF and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VXF vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXF
MOAT

Technology

19.8%
32.8%

Industrials

19.3%
13.5%

Financial Services

14.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

13.3%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.3%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.8%

Energy

5.1%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Communication Services

3.3%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
17.5%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Technology

VXF
19.8%
MOAT
32.8%

Industrials

VXF
19.3%
MOAT
13.5%

Financial Services

VXF
14.6%
MOAT
6.7%

Healthcare

VXF
13.3%
MOAT
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VXF
9.7%
MOAT
10.3%

Real Estate

VXF
6.0%
MOAT
0.8%

Energy

VXF
5.1%
MOAT

-

Basic Materials

VXF
4.2%
MOAT

-

Communication Services

VXF
3.3%
MOAT
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

VXF
2.7%
MOAT
17.5%

Utilities

VXF
2.0%
MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXF vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXF vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VXFMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.02

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

3.11

+6.60

VXF vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXF and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VXF vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXFMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-33.31%

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-12.43%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.92%

-21.44%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-23.96%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

-33.31%

-8.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-4.45%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-3.83%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

4.06%

-1.16%

Volatility

VXF vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXFMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

4.13%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

9.90%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

13.93%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

18.20%

+4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

18.68%

+3.65%

VXF vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXF vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.02%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXF and MOAT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 12.32% for VXF. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.02% for VXF.

VXF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.47% for MOAT.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXF and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer