VXF vs. MOAT
VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Completion Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXF returned 12.32%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VXF charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
VXF vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VXF has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 12.32%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
VXF
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
VXF vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 14.37% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXF and MOAT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VXF and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXF vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXF
MOAT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Technology
VXF
MOAT
Industrials
VXF
MOAT
Financial Services
VXF
MOAT
Healthcare
VXF
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
VXF
MOAT
Real Estate
VXF
MOAT
Energy
VXF
MOAT
-
Basic Materials
VXF
MOAT
-
Communication Services
VXF
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
VXF
MOAT
Utilities
VXF
MOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXF vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
VXF
MOAT
VXF vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXF | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.16 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.02 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 3.11 | +6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXF vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXF | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -33.31% | -24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -12.43% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.92% | -21.44% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -23.96% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.72% | -33.31% | -8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -4.45% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -3.83% | -5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.06% | -1.16% |
Volatility
VXF vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXF | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 4.13% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 9.90% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 13.93% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 18.20% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 18.68% | +3.65% |
VXF vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VXF vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXF and MOAT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXF has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 12.32% for VXF. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.02% for VXF.
VXF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.47% for MOAT.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXF and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer