PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VXC.TO (Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF) and LGAG.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXC.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada China A Inclusion Index, while LGAG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VXC.TO returned 13.65%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for LGAG.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VXC.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGAG.L.

Performance

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VXC.TO is traded in CAD, while LGAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGAG.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXC.TO achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than LGAG.L's 10.66% return.

VXC.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
7.19%
YTD
13.63%
6M
12.36%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
13.05%

LGAG.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.17%
YTD
10.66%
6M
10.30%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VXC.TO
Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF		13.63%15.89%26.06%19.20%-13.02%17.20%14.13%20.47%-4.97%
LGAG.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF		10.66%15.50%13.40%2.13%1.05%2.27%6.18%12.82%-21.64%

Correlation

The correlation between VXC.TO and LGAG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018

0.50

The correlation between VXC.TO and LGAG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VXC.TO
LGAG.L

Technology

31.2%
1.9%

Financial Services

15.2%
41.2%

Industrials

10.5%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
6.4%

Communication Services

9.0%
3.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.1%

Energy

3.8%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
16.4%

Utilities

2.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
8.6%

Technology

VXC.TO
31.2%
LGAG.L
1.9%

Financial Services

VXC.TO
15.2%
LGAG.L
41.2%

Industrials

VXC.TO
10.5%
LGAG.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VXC.TO
9.1%
LGAG.L
6.4%

Communication Services

VXC.TO
9.0%
LGAG.L
3.7%

Healthcare

VXC.TO
8.4%
LGAG.L
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

VXC.TO
4.9%
LGAG.L
3.1%

Energy

VXC.TO
3.8%
LGAG.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

VXC.TO
3.0%
LGAG.L
16.4%

Utilities

VXC.TO
2.8%
LGAG.L
2.7%

Real Estate

VXC.TO
1.6%
LGAG.L
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF

L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF

Often compared with VXC.TO:
VXC.TO vs. XAW.TOVXC.TO vs. XEQT.TOVXC.TO vs. VEQT.TOVXC.TO vs. VFV.TOVXC.TO vs. VTVXC.TO vs. XEF.TOVXC.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with LGAG.L:
LGAG.L vs. ^SPLRCSLGAG.L vs. CPJ1.LLGAG.L vs. VDPG.LLGAG.L vs. SPY5.LLGAG.L vs. ^GSPCLGAG.L vs. SPYLGAG.L vs. VGEK.DE

Return for Risk

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VXC.TO
VXC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VXC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
LGAG.L
LGAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LGAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VXC.TOLGAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.48
1.59

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.45
2.39

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.28

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.68

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

7.50

+7.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the LGAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXC.TO and LGAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VXC.TOLGAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.59

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.37

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.22

+0.61

Drawdowns

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum LGAG.L drawdown of -36.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXC.TO and LGAG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VXC.TOLGAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-36.66%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-7.28%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.76%

-23.01%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

-23.01%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.38%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-9.70%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.60%

-0.56%

Volatility

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) is 3.81%, while L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that VXC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VXC.TOLGAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.38%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

9.65%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

12.25%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

21.03%

-7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

22.03%

-6.75%

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXC.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LGAG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VXC.TO vs. LGAG.L - Dividend Comparison

VXC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while LGAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGAG.L
L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXC.TO
Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF		1.22%1.39%1.45%1.68%1.82%1.48%1.46%1.80%1.94%1.68%1.85%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

VXC.TO and LGAG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VXC.TO.

VXC.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while LGAG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VXC.TO tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada China A Inclusion Index, while LGAG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VXC.TO and 0.10% for LGAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXC.TO and LGAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer